Montesquieu s Views On The Constitution - 1472 Words

The plaintiff argues that the Framers of the Constitution infringed upon the authors of various historical documents that influenced the Constitution. The defendant would like to rebuke the said claim and provides several reasons why. Montesquieu’s most important contribution to political theory in the U.S. are his ideas and works on the separation of powers between the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government, which became the foundation of the U.S. Constitution. Although the Framers of the Constitution adopted his ideas, they were not completely plagiarized. A related idea of Montesquieu’s was that checks and balances should be in place to keep each branch in control. Madison and the other Framers were influenced by these ideas and constructed many well thought out checks and balances that are unique to the U.S. form of government. This is an example of paraphrasing someone’s ideas. In fact, Montesquieu also paraphrased other’s ideas. M ontesquieu was but one of many Enlightenment influences on the Constitution, and many of these other works and ideas influenced Montesquieu himself in his â€Å"Spirit of Laws†. For instance, John Locke not only influenced the American Founders, but also was paraphrased by Montesquieu, as many of Locke’s concepts of natural rights appear in both the Constitution and in â€Å"The Spirit of Laws†. This shows that one cannot claim an idea and not expect other people to adapt it, and as such, the Framers have the right to use theoriesShow MoreRelatedThe Political Landscape Of France1367 Words   |  6 Pagesgreat thinkers, Baron de Montesquieu and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, both paved the way for the French and other Enlightenment revolutions during the 18th and 19th centuries. Although neither of the men saw the manifestations of their ideas in the American or French Revolutions, their influence is unquestionable to these movements. Without the political and economic atmosphere in France and Europe during the 18th and 19th century, the ideas and beliefs of thinkers like Montesquieu and Rousseau would notRead MoreCritical Analysis of Good-bye, Montesquieu by Bruce Ackerman1454 Words   |  6 PagesCRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ARTICLE ‘GOOD BYE MONTESQUIEU’ INTRODUCTION:- â€Å"Power must never be trusted without a check†. The French jurist Montesquieu introduced the principle of â€Å"Separation of Power† (also known as Trias Politica) for the first time in his book L. Esprit Des Lois (Spirit of Laws) published in 1748. This doctrine mean the fact that one person or body of persons should not exerciseRead MoreThe Separation Of Powers Of The United States1403 Words   |  6 Pagesconnected to particular cases by the judiciary. There is relationship between these 3 organs, i.e. the legislature, executive and the judiciary. These all are deal with the doctrine of Separation of Powers. Constitution of India is responsible for the functioning of these three organs. Constitution insures that there is a proper balance between all three organs. This is done with the help of separation of powers. Along this doctrine this principle holds extraordinary significance in keeping up a preciseRead MoreThe Age Of Enlightenment And The Scientific Revolution1675 Words   |  7 PagesEnlightenment raised new co ncepts in education, democracy, and human freedom. The new humanistic philosophy promoted the polish of the human intelligence and made education a longing that lasted in the following centuries. Names like John Locke, Montesquieu, Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot, and many more, contributed with their ideas about reasoning, religious tolerance, and human equality to the formation of human beings with a wide intellectual capacity that would participate in the future democraticRead MoreThe Beginning Of The Year1524 Words   |  7 Pagessuch as Voltaire considered England’s government the most progressive in Europe. The Glorious Revolution of 1688 had given England a constitutional monarchy. In essence, this meant that various laws limited the power of the English king. Despite the view of the philosophes, however, a growing number of England’s colonists in North America accused England of a tyrannical rule. Emboldened by Enlightenment ideas, they would attempt to overthro w what was then the mightiest power on earth and create theirRead MoreEssay The Foundations of Government831 Words   |  4 Pagescritics of that time, also known as the philosophers. These philosophers were controversial thinkers and pioneered the intellectual movements of the 1700s. They stood up for what they believed in, although they were constantly criticized and censured by many other people. Such philosophers include Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Aristotle, and Montesquieu. Although their beliefs contradicted, they were all working to change what they thought was wrong with their present government. They were four men whoRead MoreThe French Revolution And The Revolution Of The Late 1700 S1280 Words   |  6 Pagesoccurring throughout Central America, were all directly inspired by the French Revolution of the late 1700’s. Evidence of this can be seen simply by looking back at world history. History shows that many philosophies of the American Revolution were actually id eas that either closely parallel or are directly taken from the writing of various French scholars, such as Voltaire and The Baron De Montesquieu. The very essence of American politics, Democracy, is in actuality, a French concept as well. DemocracyRead MoreTo What Extent Was The Enlightenment The Main Driving Force Behind The American And French Revolutions?1479 Words   |  6 Pagesanalyze multiple Enlightenment thinkers ideas, and make connections without having a narrow focus. However, the information presented in this source was a broad view of Enlightenment ideas and underscored the political theories of multiple Enlightenment thinkers whereas the purpose of this investigation was to identify the Enlightenment s impact on the start of revolutions and explore other possible causes. Therefore, the scope of the source failed to agree with the scope of this investigation. FurthermoreRead MoreHow Did The Enlightenment Thinkers Influence The Enlightenment?955 Words   |  4 Page sEnlightenment thinkers had a huge impact on how we view, and run our government today. They contributed greatly to the influences we have in our world and even the laws we abide by in our world today. These thinkers were extremely influential to our government and how they shaped the country. The reason being, they had amazing ideas that went for the better of the people, and that was exactly the dream that they had for the U.S. We follow what they said, and thought, and put our own twist on it toRead MoreJean Jacque Rousseau s Theory Of A Social Contract881 Words   |  4 PagesRousseau was one of the most controversial philosophers from 1712-1778. The first to speak explicitly of human rights. He was a Swiss philosopher who was influenced by the French revolution. He believed that people basically everyone is good but it s society that corrupts them to do wrong. Each philosopher had their own ideal world, and his was to have people make laws and obey them. However, Rousseau has a different opinion on the theory of a social contract but also did help develop the theory

Should We Have Gone to War in Iraq Persausive Essay

Operation Iraqi Freedom How many people do you know that have fought in the United States most recent war? This war was called Operation Iraqi Freedom. Many people have family members that fought in this war, or maybe a neighbor. The Iraq war was started shortly after 9/11 when the United States felt that Iraq leader Saddam Hussein had weapons of Mass Destruction. (WMD’s) With the rumor that Iraq had WMD’s President Bush felt the US military had to go on the offense to assure the safety of the country. With that in mind I agree with going to war in Iraq. Also, Saddam Hussein was also rumored to be supporting and housing terrorists and members of Al-Qaeda in Iraq. Finally, Saddam Hussein committed many acts of violence against the Iraqi†¦show more content†¦While riding through the city of Dujail, an attempt on Hussein’s life was made by Shiite militants. Saddam Hussein decided that he need to wipe out the entire city of Dujail, which had 148 residents, including dozens upon do zens of children. These were the crimes that Saddam Hussein brought up on and eventually executed for. Hussein’s worst acts came in the years 1986-1989. In these years his administration called for an extermination of any living thing in the northern Kurdish region. In this time Hussein killed 182,000 Kurds using chemical weapons to kill many of them. As you can see the United States could no longer have this man ruling an entire country. Finally, rumored WMD’s were the biggest reason the United States decided to go to war. After many years of the UN searching for these weapons Iraq decided not to let inspectors into the country anymore. The Bush administration took these signals as Iraq and Hussein not wanting the UN to find the weapons of mass destruction. Before the invasion, and before inspectors were banned from Iraq, rocket warheads, 50 liters of mustard gas, and 50 missiles were decommissioned. These things gave Bush administration a strong feeling that Saddam H ussein was hiding WMD’s from the rest of the world. Although no WMD’s were found during the war, I still feel that going into Iraq was the right decision. There was no way we could let there be rumors about Saddam Hussein having WMD with what he has done to people

Disclosure Obligations Of Vendors Of Shares -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Disclosure Obligations Of Vendors Of Shares? Answer: Introduction The case of Forty Two International Pty Limited v Barnes [2014] FCA 85 revolves around a dispute where the director duties were involved regarding the transaction which involved a group of companies. The issue in this case which had to be decided was whether the director of a company had breached the duties for the non-disclosure of the personal interest based on section 182 and 191 of the Corporations Act, 2001 (Fernandes, 2014). These sections relate the use of position and the material personal interest, and cover the director duties in terms of not misusing the same (Cassidy, 2006). The judgement of this case was handed down on February 18th, 2014 and is relevant owing to the same dealing with issues which are deceptive or misleading due to the silence or non disclosure during the contractual negotiations, the loss of opportunity damages, and the application of contract clauses which attempt at excluding the liability for extra contract representations (Condon, 2014). The followi ng discussion presents a summary of this case, specifically in terms of the duties breached and the decision given by the court. Background of the Case The respondents of this case were the shareholders and the directors of the company, i.e., of Forty Two International Pty Limited (Forty), who had sold their shares to BlueFreeway Limited which they held in the company. This was based on the Ashare purchase agreement (Agreement) which had been created in October 2006. The respondents continued to be the directors of Forty even after sale. There were some payments to the respondents under the Agreement which had been calculated by referring to the earnings of Forty in the later years. Particularly the additional payment became payable only where the earnings before interest and tax for the year of 2007 was either 2.5 million or a higher value (Gadens, 2014). The earnings of Forty were however less than what had been expected. For the year 2007, the earnings before interest and tax of Forty got the mark of $2.5 million which resulted in Forty getting in an intellectual property license in May 2007 with a third party. Based on this, a licence fee had to be paid on June 30th, 2007 and this fee was around $4.1 million. BlueFreeway Limited was not involved in or even aware of this license being granted by Forty which had been approved by the board of directors of BlueFreeway Limited in May 2007. The respondents had initially shown to BlueFreeway Limited that an independent third party would be financing the license fee (Gadens, 2014). Though, this was not done and what actually happened was that the respondents secured the finance for the license fee and concealed in a deliberate manner that they had been involved in financing of this fee from BlueFreeway Limited (Taylor, 2015). After the Licence fee had been paid, the respondents negotiated upon an agreement for termination of the contractual arrangements with Forty and BlueFreeway Limited which included the Agreement. As a result of this, the directors resigned from Forty through an exit agreement which provided that the respondents had to be given the additional payment. Further, this value had to be calculated based on the earnings before interest and profit of 2007 which included the license fee. It was claimed by the applicants that the respondents had been in breach of their implied term in the Agreement, by not disclosing the role which they had in the financing of Licence Fee, as they had been engaged in deceptive or misleading conduct and this resulted in the contravention of the statutory and fiduciary duties as the directors of the company (Gadens, 2014). Duties breached The Corporations Act, 2001 the directors have been imposed with different duties, which have to be, followed properly (Gibson and Fraser, 2014). In this regard, section 182 of this act provides that the directors are not to make an improper use of the position which they have in the company (ICNL, 2018). This section further provides that this is not to be done for gaining advantage for someone else or for themselves (WIPO, 2015). Under section 191 of this act, the directors have the duty of giving the notice to the other directors regarding them holding any material personal interest which could give rise to a conflict (Jade, 2018). The allegation made by the applicants was that by funding the licence transactions, there had been a breach of section 182 by the respondents as they acted towards advancing of their interests and for gaining an advantage for their own self where they secured an addition earn out payment of $16 million (Gadens, 2014). However, the respondents completely denied that there had been a contravention of section 182. They stated that the conduct in funding of the license transaction did not have or include their involvement in the usage of position as the directors of Forty, provided that they had actually given person guarantee to third party. Despite any situation, the respondents stated that there was a lack of improper use of position for gaining benefit for them as the purpose of their conduct was to make certain that the CMUK (which was the party with which the licensing agreement had been done) did not default in the financial obligations which they owed to Forty. They further stated that it was Forty which got the benefit from the undertaken licence transaction and in receiving the additional budgets (Silberberg and Hammerschlag, 2014). With regards to section 191, it was claimed by the applicants that there was a lack of disclosure by respondents to Forty that they had funded this licence transaction themselves. However, this was denied by the respondents where they contended that the applicants had constructive/ actual notice of the role in the licence transaction funding. In any situation, the respondents stated that there had been no contravention, since the conduct did not cover with of the individual having a major personal interest regarding the affairs of Forty since they did not get any interest in fees or licence. They submitted that the interest in getting the entitlement under the Agreement was only related to the affairs of BlueFreeway Limited and there was no duty owed to BlueFreeway Limited for disclosure as they were not the officers of this company (Silberberg and Hammerschlag, 2014). Decision of the Court In this matter, the court dismissed the aspects of claims of BlueFreeway Limited for their claims for damages which had been caused due to the alleged contraventions by the respondents of the statutory duties. They also recognized limit regarding the scope of statutory duties which the directors owed regarding the group of companies in which the director had not been a director of the other group company which was involved (Silberberg and Hammerschlag, 2014). It was state by the court that since the respondents had been Fortys directors, and not that of BlueFreeway Limited. This meant that the statutory duties were only owed by them to Forty and not to BlueFreeway Limited. Though, it was determined by the court that due to the conduct undertaken by the respondents, it was Forty instead of the respondents which got the benefit from the license transaction. Apart from this, the court also stated that Forty did not have to bear any loss from the conduct of respondents and refused to recognize the raised duties on part of parent company of Forty, i.e., BlueFreeway Limited for paying to the respondents the additional $16 million earn out payment as the loss of Forty (Jade, 2014). Owing to the very same reasons, the court also dismissed the allegations of applicants regarding the breach of different fiduciary duties by the respondent which existed at the general law, which were similar to the aforementioned statutory duties (Austlii, 2014). Despite the aforementioned findings in this matter by the court regarding the alleged contraventions of the statutory duties, it was ultimately established by the court that the conduct of the respondents did constitute as a contravention of the implied terms of the Agreement. This was due to the respondents being bound to make disclosure to BlueFreeway Limited regarding all the information which they knew and which could have been deemed ass relevant for calculating the target earnings which secured the payment of earn out based on the Agreement. This was in addition to the deceptive or misleading conduct due to the licence agreement which depicted to the board of BlueFreeway Limited and the market to have been undertaken at genuine arms length transaction. A critical approach was adopted by the court towards the conduct of the respondents in finding that they had been driven by personal concerns for maximising the earn out payments (Silberberg and Hammerschlag, 2014). With regards to the issue of causation, the decision given by the New South Wales Court of Appeal in Daniels v Anderson (1995) 37 NSWLR 438. Justice Griffiths stated that for determining the cause, there was a need to approach based on the proof, which was based on the balance of probabilities. The view of the court here was that the evidence was enough to show a causal link in the conduct of the respondents and in the lost opportunity of BlueFreeway Limited for negotiation a lower termination payment. For the purpose of loss opportunity also, this case was cited. Justice Griffiths stated that the question of lost opportunity had to be based on degree of probability of possibility in the case. He further stated that the court had to offer an informed basis or sound basis for assessing the value of loss which was aided through the pertinent evidence. And where this evidence was not present, this had to be seen in the materials before it. It was finally stated that the global approach had to be taken in deciding the value and a lump sum award had to be made (Condon, 2014). This led to the BlueFreeway Limited being awarded the damages which amounted to $2 million. This was a reflection of the lost opportunity of BlueFreeway Limited or their chancing for negotiating the termination payment with the respondents, which was a sum quite less in comparison to the $16 million being actually paid (Silberberg and Hammerschlag, 2014). Relevance This discussion showcased the significance of making certain that the earn out provisions had to be properly structured in transaction in which the respondents continued to involved in an active manner in the acquired business. Through this decision, the need for company, particularly the ones which have different subsidiaries having varied management and board members, for having in place the proper disclosure and reporting procedures was reinforced. This was particularly in such cases where the management and the directors acted on the companys behalf (Silberberg and Hammerschlag, 2014). This decision is also important for the purpose of clarifying the operation of law based on the contracts implied terms, the loss of opportunity damages, and the deceptive and misleading conduct owing to the silence or non disclosure. This decision reaffirmed the traditional approach of the courts in implying in a contractual term, where it provides business efficacy to contract and also complements the express terms covered under the contract (Condon, 2014). Conclusion In the preceding segments of this discussion, the different aspects of the case of Forty Two International Pty Limited v Barnes were discussed. This case involved the director duties being claimed to have been contravened. Even though the breach of director duties was not established in this case, the parties were nonetheless made liable and penalties were imposed on them. The reason for this was the breach of contractual terms in the Agreement which formed the base of this issue. The damages in this case were awarded for the value of lost opportunity by the company. This case is a reminder of the courts deploying the traditional approaches in deciding upon the breach of terms of the contract based on business efficacy. This case saw the judges referring to the previous judgements in deciding on the value which had to be awarded. This case is also a lesson as it presents such situations which would not result in the breach of director duties. References Austlii. (2014) Forty Two International Pty Limited v Barnes [2014] FCA 85 (18 February 2014). [Online] Austlii. Available from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/FCA/2014/85.html [Accessed on: 23/01/18] Cassidy, J. (2006) Concise Corporations Law. 5th ed. NSW: The Federation Press. Condon, W. (2014) Forty Two International Pty Limited v Barnes [2014] FCA 85. [Online] Lexology. Available from: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=208bf581-89ce-4ce7-ab77-9558ff97e2bb [Accessed on: 23/01/18] Fernandes, M. (2014) In this Issue. [Online] Butterworths Corporation Law Bulletin. Available from: https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/44096/4/06772593-5932-4FB6-8678-34265262D9BF.pdf [Accessed on: 23/01/18] Gadens. (2014) Disclosure obligations of vendors of shares under 'earn out' provisions. [Online] Gadens. Available from: https://www.gadens.com/publications/Pages/Disclosure-obligations-fo-vendors-of-hsares-under-%27earn-out%27-provisions.aspx [Accessed on: 23/01/18] Gibson, A., and Fraser, D. (2014) Business Law 2014. 8th ed. Melbourne: Pearson Education Australia. ICNL. (2018) Corporations Act 2001. [Online] ICNL. Available from: https://www.icnl.org/research/library/files/Australia/Corps2001Vol4WD02.pdf [Accessed on: 23/01/18] Jade. (2014) Forty Two International Pty Limited v Barnes [2014] FCA 85. [Online] Jade. Available from: https://jade.io/article/314106 [Accessed on: 23/01/18] Jade. (2018) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). [Online] Jade. Available from: https://jade.io/article/216652/section/2204 [Accessed on: 23/01/18] Silberberg, A., and Hammerschlag, G. (2014) Breach of statutory duties by a director under ss 182 and 191 of the Corporations Act by non-disclosure of a personal interest in the context of a group of companies. [Online] ABL Sydney. Available from: https://www.abl.com.au/MediaLibraries/ABL/ABL/Insights%20and%20News/Case%20notes/ButterworthsCorporationLawBulletin05p16-18.pdf [Accessed on: 23/01/18] Taylor, G. (2015) You mean that isn't part of the deal? Earn-outs and implied terms. [Online] Clayton UTZ. Available from: https://www.claytonutz.com/knowledge/2015/march/you-mean-that-isn-t-part-of-the-deal-earn-outs-and-implied-terms [Accessed on: 23/01/18] WIPO. (2015) Corporations Act 2001. [Online] WIPO. Available from: https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=370817 [Accessed on: 23/01/18]

Lets go fishing free essay sample

My eyelids opened too a blurry yet familiar figure over me. I strained my eyes trying to focus In on the thing controlling to elude my vision, and finally my eyes start to focus in as I wake up. Kind of like a camera on its subject. All the colors and familiarities of the room started to get through, and my senses finally started to come alive as I moved and took in the feel of my environment. As that happened, the blurry figure from before reveals itself. It transforms into my father as he starts to finish cooking what smelled like sausage and eggs. I moved around underneath my covers trenching and getting a feel for my sense of touch as I slowly got up and laid my bare feet on the soft carpet. I got up finally and walked over to where my dad Is standing. After noticing the sun has barely come up, the shadows being cast off everything in the room start to make for a peaceful morning. We will write a custom essay sample on Lets go fishing or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Especially when infused with the smell of a hot breakfast on the stove. The time of day when the birds are quieter and make a soothing rhythmic composition of morning tones. Finally, I make it over to my dad and take a look at our soon-to-be feast.I stand for a moment and try to say meeting as I put words together In my rued state, and finally the words come out. That smells amazing. I say. Trying to express just how good it smelled. It should. Youre lucky I got up early enough to make us breakfast. he says. I laugh and walk back over to the couch I 2 slept on. Right beside it is my bag with all my things. I prepare my clothes and walk back to the counter where my dad has sat breakfast on a plate for me to take. I take it and quickly scarf it down not wanting to waste any time.After all, Im about go on a trip. One Vive been longing for all year. After eating breakfast and getting ready, we pack our things and head out the door. Where too? Where else for a father and son trip? To the lake for a fishing trip of course. One of the most cliche yet beneficial trips. Meanwhile, my dad and I listen to music quietly while riding the highway. The sun is still slowly coming up. I slowly drifted off Into sleep from the soothing hum of the highway, and when woke up, we had arrived. Well In a town near the lake anyway, but I loved the scenery.There were beautiful old houses that had been overgrown, old rusty cars and parts everywhere, ND the trees seemed to be perfectly positioned so that they made of spectacular funnel over the road with little rays of sunshine managing to breach through the leaves. Then, as I looked at my dad, I could tell we both knew that mutual feeling of peace in that moment. Now after the long drive, we finally pull up to the lake. I get out, and Im Immediately hit by a warm and refreshing breeze. My dad and I then start to walk towards the docks. I notice the sound of the waves halting the shore and the docks, but it was the only sound to hear.It was so quiet and serene. Like a dream. How many fish do you think well catch says my dad. Enough for the both of us to fill up at diner. I say. He chuckled a little and by then we had reached the docks. We walked out to the end where you could see the sunrise over the water. I know we both love that. We stand for a brief moment admiring the scenery and then turn back to head back to the car. Having yet another conversation about how many fish we 3 We make it back to the car and pull over to the boat ramp where we quickly get the boat into the water, pull over the car, and get back in the boat. The boat slowly makes its way out of the no wake zone and were off. The engine of the boat starts to oar, the front end rears back as the water starts to spray after hitting wave after wave. We ride for some time. In the meantime, my dad and I have a conversation about old cars, car shows, and basically Just random things until we see a place inside a cove that looks like its teeming with life. It looks like a marsh with tall blades of grass protruding from the water as birds walk around trying to find a small fish or even a minnow. So we set course too this place and drop anchor as close to shore as possible.Feeling excited and optimistic, we threw our lines in and waited. We sat for awhile. Not talking or really doing anything for the expectation of a fish too quickly latch on and find its way aboard, but nothing happened. We start talking after some times has passed. We still believed there was nothing to worry about. This was an amazing place to fish, and we both knew it. We tried different bait after a while, and even different techniques like casting. Still nothing. The hours pass as my dad and I talk. We talk about school, places we wanted to go, things we wanted too do, and how the fish Just wouldnt bite.Finally, my dad asks me, Do you want go back? We can come back another day. I sat in silence looking at him and off too our lines. My hope was dwindling, but I knew if I didnt persevere, that I would regret it. So I used that as motivation. If you dont do it, youll regret it. I keep saying to myself. So I look over to my dad and simply say, No, not quite yet. Then I take out my spare rod and start casting as far out as I could in every direction. I wasnt going to give up. My dad sat back and watched while laying in the shade as I slaved away at the line until all off 4 sudden I hear it, criticizing as the line goes out.The next thing I know, the rod is in he water. I didnt think, and I didnt hesitate in my next action. I Jumped in after the rod. It was half submerged and being strung along by a fish. So I dove, and somehow the rod was right below me and still. The fish must have turned and left slack in the line. This was my chance. I made a lunge towards the rod as quickly as I could being underwater. I felt the cork end finally come into grasp. I put all the grip strength I have onto the pole and yank as hard as I can. I instantly feel the fish still on the end and go back to the surface while still trying to hold onto the rod.I come up too my ad who is furious, but sees that Im still fighting with a fish. So he grabs me and pulls me up onto the back of the boat. Then I start reeling as fast as I could whenever the fish would allow me until finally I see hope. At the edge of the boat I see fins and a big catfish Just waiting to be taken. I couldnt think of anything to do except scream. Screaming miss! and Did you see that? I chanted for a minute or two as my dad laughs and grabs the fish. Muff wanted a fish didnt hay? my dad says. At least I didnt give up. I say. After that, we decided to head out. Nothing could top that experience.So we took a couple pictures with the fish, released it, and went home satisfied with what we had accomplished. Then my dad said something to me that seems too stick. Well at least youre not a quitter. he says in a Joking manner, but that will stick with finish things. This event didnt really fix me either, but it helped me out a lot. It helped me notice how determination can get you anywhere and that you wont get far without it. After this, I thought about it more and more and it gradually led to me actually becoming a confident and more determined person for the most part. Who 5 knew what Just a little fishing trip could do to you?